First of all, let’s clarify what the NASA budget is. Do you realize that the $850 billion dollar bailout, that sum of money is greater than the entire 50-year running budget of NASA?
And so when someone says, “We don’t have enough money for this space probe,” I’m asking, no, it’s not that you don’t have enough money, it’s that the distribution of money that you’re spending is warped in some way that you are removing the only thing that gives people something to dream about tomorrow.
You remember the 60s and 70s. You didn’t have to go more than a week before there’s an article in Life magazine, “The Home of Tomorrow,” “The City of Tomorrow,” “Transportation of Tomorrow”. All of that ended in the 1970s. After we stopped going to the Moon, it all ended. We stopped dreaming.
And so I worry that the decision that Congress makes doesn’t factor in the consequences of those decisions on tomorrow. Tomorrow’s gone. They’re playing for the quarterly report, they’re playing for the next election cycle, and that is mortgaging the actual future of this nation, and the rest of the world is going to pass us by.” —
This is brilliant and sad. It’s the end of dreams time.
If I ever meet Richard Dawkins, I’m going to hug that magnificent bastard.
Surely we can call out ad hominem even when we agree, right?
great use of twitter by a politician. that’s how you do it.
Twitter is great for zingers. Is the problem with politics too few zingers?
This isn’t good because it is biting, but because it is honest and candid, which is another thing twitter is great for. Too bad you basically need to lie to get elected.
I wonder what percentage of elected politicians actually believe in god.